Main benefits: The food must contain no or minimal (less than 0.9 percent) genetically modified (or engineered) organisms, also called GMOs. • Manufacturers must work with independent ...

Since the election, the anti-GMO movement here has mostly fallen apart, thought it is still strong in Europe. Their dream of using a government-sanctioned, GMO warning label to scare consumers ...

Consumer Reports' tests of breakfast cereals, chips, soy infant formulas, and other popular products found that GMOs lurk in many packaged foods—including some that carry labels suggesting that ...

Given the evidence of how varied and common these effects are, the answer should be no. However, many meditation and mindfulness instructors believe that these practices can only do good and don’t ...

However, many consumers have demanded labels that let them know whether foods contain genetically modified material. In 2014, Vermont enacted a strict law mandating GMO food labeling. Fearing a ...

Newsom was concerned the bill would codify "highly prescriptive labeling content" that could later be changed by legislative ...

Today’s edition: Federal officials have seen no evidence ... the voluntary labeling system it created in 2011, which ...

A few boys got hold of it, tossed it around jokingly, and were inspired to give me the nickname “NoMo” for no movement ... “Evidence from tobacco studies show that warning labels can ...

The legislation seeks to implement mandatory warning labels on social media platforms ... Only then can they proceed to the platform. No hiding or obscuring: the Act specifically forbids platforms ...

Would you still eat your snack if it came with a warning label ... saying there isn’t enough evidence that labels can ...